How The Influence of Dynamic Communication of Adolescents to Prevent Bullying

Authors

  • Ratih Siti Aminah IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Pudji Muljono IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Djuara P. Lubis IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Dwi Hastuti IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v9i3.132

Keywords:

Adolescents, parents, peergroup, social interaction

Abstract

This study investigates that adolescent communication is influenced by various factors, including individual characteristics, parents, and peers. This study aims to analyze the influence of adolescent characteristics on their communication patterns with parents and peers, examine how parental characteristics affect communication with adolescents, identify the role of peers in shaping adolescent communication patterns, and explore the relationship between adolescent interpersonal communication and the tendency toward negative behaviors such as bullying. This research employs a quantitative approach, analyzing data from 481 respondents. The findings indicate that age, gender, and birth order influence the intensity and openness of adolescent communication. Parental characteristics, including age, education, and occupation, also determine family communication patterns, with parents with higher education levels tending to have more democratic communication styles. Furthermore, peers play a significant role in shaping adolescent communication patterns and behavior, particularly in social and psychological aspects. Poor interpersonal communication with parents correlates with an increased risk of negative behaviors such as bullying. This study concludes that effective family communication and the influence of the social environment are crucial in shaping adolescent interactions.

References

Abdillah, A. A. (2018). Gambaran Pengalaman Bully Pada Remaja Dengan Status Mental Berisiko Gangguan Psikosis. Universitas Airlangga.

Aisyah, D. N., Ahmad, R. A., Artama, W. T., Adisasmito, W., Diva, H., Hayward, A. C., & Kozlakidis, Z. (2020). Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors on Utilizing Mobile Health Technology for TB in Indonesia: A Qualitative Pilot Study. Frontiers in Public Health, 8(October), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.531514

Allen-meares, P., & Pugach, M. (n.d.). Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration on Behalf of Handicapped Children and Youh.

Andriani, V. E. (2018). Interpersonal Communication in Workplace Bullying. 260(Icomacs), 58–60. https://doi.org/10.2991/icomacs-18.2018.14

Asri, K. H., Rahman, L. N., & Ummah, R. (2022). Dampak Bullying, Kekerasan Dan Hate Speech Pada Anak: Studi Kasus Di Smk Swasta Caringin Bogor, Indonesia. Jurnal Anifa: Studi Gender Dan Anak, 3(2), 108–119.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23–28), 2.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26.

Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586.

Bylund, C. L. (2018). Family Communication: Cohesion and Change. Routledge.

Christensen, J. (2016). A critical reflection of Bronfenbrenner s development ecology model. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 69(1), 22–28.

Coloroso, B. (2002). The Bully, The Bullied And The Bystander: From Preschool to High School How Perents and Teacher Can Help Break The Cycle Of Violence. Diambil Dari Https://Books. Google. Co. Id. How/Parents/and/Teacher/Can/Little/Break/the/Cycle/of/Violence. Diakses Pada Tanggal, 3.

Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217–223.

Dias, P., Brito, R., Ribbens, W., Daniela, L., Rubene, Z., Dreier, M., Gemo, M., Di Gioia, R., & Chaudron, S. (2016). The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from ‘Gatekeepers’ to ‘Scaffolders.’ Global Studies of Childhood, 6(4), 414–427.

Dwipayanti, I. A. S., & Indrawati, K. R. (2014). Hubungan antara tindakan bullying dengan prestasi belajar anak korban bullying pada tingkat sekolah dasar. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 1(2), 251–260.

Fikri, A. M. (2023). Analisis Awal Terhadap Dinamika Penanggulangan Cyberbullying di Ruang Digital Indonesia Dalam Perspeftif Hukum Pidana. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 2306–2317.

Galyani Moghaddam, G. (2010). Information technology and gender gap: toward a global view. The Electronic Library, 28(5), 722–733.

Garrard, J. (2020). Health sciences literature review made easy.

Gentili, D., Bardin, A., Ros, E., Piovesan, C., Ramigni, M., Dalmanzio, M., Dettori, M., Filia, A., & Cinquetti, S. (2020). Impact of communication measures implemented during a school tuberculosis outbreak on risk perception among parents and school staff, Italy, 2019. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030911

Kawasaki, I., & Dobrochinski Candido, K. M. (2024). Preparing Future Teachers for Social and Emotional Learning Integration.

Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family communication patterns theory: A social cognitive approach.

Downloads

Published

29-12-2025

How to Cite

Aminah, R. S., Muljono , P. ., Lubis , D. P., & Hastuti , D. . (2025). How The Influence of Dynamic Communication of Adolescents to Prevent Bullying. JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES), 9(3), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v9i3.132