A Scientometrics Analysis of The Research Productivity of Pakuan University As Evidenced In The Scopus Database From 2010 To 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v9i1.27Abstract
This study examines Pakuan University's scholarly output from 2010 to 2024 using Scopus data. The investigation encompassed research productivity, trends, subject areas, publication sources, author contributions, and collaborative efforts. Pakuan University produced 685 papers, with Scopus publications showing rapid growth, with a 32.7% yearly increase. An average citation count of 3,867 per document suggests a moderate impact. Among 1,780 contributing authors, only 12 papers were single-authored, emphasising the prevalence of collaborative research. The primary research domains include Engineering, Physics and Astronomy, Environmental Sciences, Social Science, and Computer Science. Recent research has focused on topics such as in silico, sustainability, job satisfaction, and smart villages. The main publication outlets are conference proceedings and journals, notably the IOP Conference Series, AIP Conference Proceedings, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, and Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. The five most productive authors are Anna Permanasari, Diana Widiastuti, Eneng Tita Tosida, Johan Iskandar and Mochamad Yunus, whilst the most influential are Anna Permanasari, Diana Widiastuti, Eneng Tita Tosida and Dolly Priatna. The Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA) leads in contributions, followed by the postgraduate school and the faculty of engineering. Collaborative publications are predominantly from Indonesian institutions, such as the Indonesian Education University and IPB University, with international partnerships including Japan, Malaysia, and China.
References
M. C. Kim and Y. Zhu, “Scientometrics of Scientometrics: Mapping Historical Footprint and Emerging Technologies in Scientometrics,” in Scientometrics, M. Jibu and Y. Osabe, Eds., InTech, 2018. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.77951.
A. M. Martín, E. O. Malea, J. M. Ayllón, and E. D. López-Cózar, “The counting house, measuring those who count: Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley, & Twitter,” ing.agua, vol. 18, no. 1, p. ix, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.4995/ia.2014.3293.
D. Kukreja, S. Gupta, D. Patel, and J. N. Rai, “Scientometric review of Web 3.0,” Journal of Information Science, p. 01655515231182073, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1177/01655515231182073.
K. H. Abdullah, “A Scientometric Review of Chemical Management,” ASMScJ, vol. 18, pp. 1–11, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.32802/asmscj.2023.1341.
B. B. Winsley and Muthukannan M., “Information Security: A Scientometric Study,” in Advances in Library and Information Science, J. J. Jesubright and P. Saravanan, Eds., IGI Global, 2020, pp. 231–246. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1482-5.ch017.
N. M. Ramesh, “Scientometric Analysis of Library and Information Studies,” IJTSRD, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 65–70, 2020.
J. Mingers and L. Leydesdorff, “A review of theory and practice in scientometrics,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002.
S. Rashid, S. U. Rehman, M. Ashiq, and A. Khattak, “A Scientometric Analysis of Forty-Three Years of Research in Social Support in Education (1977–2020),” Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 149, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11040149.
R. Y. Asnani and P. Vyas, “A Scientometric Study on Literatures of the Journal ‘Scientometrics,’” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), vol. 4477, no. 1–10, Oct. 2020, Accessed: Aug. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/reader/359664090
L. Björneborn and P. Ingwersen, “Toward a basic framework for webometrics,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., vol. 55, no. 14, pp. 1216–1227, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1002/asi.20077.
“Pakuan University [2023 Rankings by topic],” EduRank.org - Discover university rankings by location. Accessed: Aug. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://edurank.org/uni/pakuan-university/rankings/
“Pakuan University [2024 Rankings by topic],” EduRank.org - Discover university rankings by location. Accessed: Jan. 24, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://edurank.org/uni/pakuan-university/rankings/
S. Khanna, N. K. Singh, D. Tewari, and H. S. Saini, “Scientometric Analysis of the Research Output of Physics and Astronomy of Guru Nanak Dev University during 2006-15,” DJLIT, vol. 37, no. 5, p. 337, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.14429/djlit.37.10683.
S. B. Chaturbhuj and N. R. Motewar, “Scientometric Analysis of the Research Productivity of Savitribai Phule Pune University,” DESIDOC Jl. Lib. Info. Technol., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 438–447, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.14429/djlit.41.6.16993.
B. Pradhan, G. K. T K, K. Singh, R. Kuri, and M. Singh, “A Scientometric Assessment of the Research Output of the Sambalpur University during 1990-2019,” Library Philosophy and Practice, no. 4444, 2020, Accessed: Jun. 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/reader/341927040
J. Rahaman and Sadik Batcha, “Scientometric Analysis and Collaboration Trends of Published Literature by State Universities from West Bengal,” JSSMS, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 18–28, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.56556/jssms.v1i2.64.
M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
N. Hernandez-Cruz, “Mapping the thematic evolution in Communication over the first two decades from the 21st century: A longitudinal approach,” Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–10, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.47909/ijsmc.88.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
