Collaborative Governance In Tourism Sector Management To Enhance Local Own-Source Revenue (Pad) In Southeast Maluku Regency, Maluku Province
Keywords:
collaborative governance, tourism management, local own-source revenue (PAD), public value, Southeast Maluku RegencyAbstract
This study analyzes the implementation of collaborative governance in tourism sector management and its contribution to Local Own-Source Revenue (PAD) in Southeast Maluku Regency. Despite the region's substantial tourism potential and a significant increase in tourist arrivals from 18,264 in 2020 to 129,300 in 2024, the contribution of the tourism sector to PAD declined from 22.73% in 2022 to 18.35% in 2024. The study aims to analyze the implementation of collaborative governance, identify supporting and inhibiting factors, and assess the creation of public value. A qualitative approach with a single-case study design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with nine informants representing local government, the private sector, and the community, as well as through field observations, document reviews, and the analysis of digital and audiovisual materials. The findings indicate that collaborative governance remains at the stage of pseudo-collaboration. Power, resource, and knowledge asymmetries are highly pronounced. Institutional design remains weak due to the absence of operational technical regulations governing partnerships, as well as the lack of specific tax and levy regulations for the tourism sector. Facilitative leadership has been inconsistent, as evidenced by seven changes in the position of Head of the Tourism Office within a four-year period. Furthermore, collaborative processes are largely event-driven and conducted on an irregular basis. Supporting factors include the government's normative commitment, the Regional Tourism Development Master Plan Regulation (RIPPARKAB), the local Maren culture, and small economic gains generated at the community level. Meanwhile, inhibiting factors are systemic in nature, including government dominance, the absence of technical regulations, non-permanent collaborative forums, low transparency, sectoral ego, and the geographical challenges associated with an archipelagic region. The study concludes that these small wins have failed to be transformed into increased PAD due to the weak institutionalization of collaborative mechanisms and the absence of horizontal accountability.
References
UNWTO, Tourism and the Sustainable Development Goals - Journey to 2030. 2017. doi: 10.18111/9789284419401.
D. Ibrahim, A. Aneta, E. Wolok, and Y. Aneta, “Optimising fiscal decentralisation: Addressing financial management challenges in Gorontalo Province,” Policy & Governance Review, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 323, 2024, doi: 10.30589/pgr.v8i3.1092.
A. Hawari, F. M. Alyasa, M. R. Akbar, and E. D. Sihaloho, “Fiscal decentralization in Indonesia: Does it curb the quality of environment?,” Journal of Economics Research and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 24–37, 2024, doi: 10.18196/jerss.v8i1.19273.
J. Madubun, “Public services in island sub-districts: Towards geography-based governance,” Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 308–327, 2024, doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12586.
P. Hayward, “Introduction: Towards an expanded concept of island studies,” Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, vol. 10, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.21463/shima.10.1.03.
M. Qiu, J. Sha, and N. Scott, “Restoration of visitors through nature-based tourism: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future research directions,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1–19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052299.
X. Ding and J. Xu, “Urban professionals’ restorative tourism: exploring the role of perceived environmental restorativeness, push and pull motivations and destination attributes on tourism expectations,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 15, no. March, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293050.
C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.
M. Moore, “On creating public value: What business might learn from government about strategic management,” 3, 2004.
L. Reina-Usuga, F. Camino, G. Gomez-Casero, and C. A. Jara Alba, “Rural tourism initiatives and their relationship to collaborative governance and perceived value: A review of recent research and trends,” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, vol. 34, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100926.
I. G. E. P. S. Sentanu, B. S. Haryono, Z. Zamrudi, and A. Praharjo, “Challenges and successes in collaborative tourism governance: A systematic literature review,” European Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 33, no. 2023, pp. 1–29, 2023, doi: 10.54055/ejtr.v33i.2669.
T. Ramukumba, “Tourism collaborative governance: The views of tourism small and medium-sized enterprises in rural areas,” Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.38140/ijms-2025.vol2.1.04.
A. P. Tjilen, B. Tambaip, and I. C. A. Phoek, “Planning of collaborative governance in tourism management; A perspective,” International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 819–825, 2023.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. 2018. doi: 10.4324/9781315707181-60.
R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications design and methods, Sixth. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







