Making Responsibility Visible, Leaving Authority Opaque: Gendered Subject Positions In Documentary Accounts Of Community Child Marriage Advocacy In South Sumatra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v10i02.400Kata Kunci:
child marriage; social identity; subject formation; gendered labour; community advocacy; responsibility-authority asymmetryAbstrak
Community advocacy against child marriage does more than communicate risk or link residents to services. It also makes social positions recognisable and distributes preventive work. This secondary qualitative analysis examines nine adult interview documents associated with Women’s Crisis Center Palembang in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Because the analysis was restricted to the approved adult corpus, girlhood is examined through adult- and programme-mediated representations. A critical interpretivist single-case design combined framework analysis with scholarship on subject formation, recognition, responsibilisation, gendered community labour, and participation. The records depict recurring dialogue, accompaniment, women’s cadres, material activities, referral, and institutional relationships. They offer three interconnected subject positions: the future-oriented girl, the preventive female caregiver, and the relational woman intermediary. These positions articulate education, employment, preparation, and delayed marriage as legitimate futures, while making women’s local knowledge and community proximity organisationally useful. Yet the records document preventive labour and recognition much more clearly than resource control, agenda-setting, household decision authority, or enforceable institutional obligations. The article proposes responsibility-authority asymmetry as a diagnostic concept for this uneven evidentiary visibility. It does not establish that authority was absent or unchanged in practice. The corpus supports reported changes in understanding, caregiving orientation, and future planning, but not behavioural change, reduced child-marriage incidence, programme effectiveness, or causal impact. The contribution is to connect social-identity formation with the allocation of preventive labour while specifying the evidentiary limits of claims about power.
Referensi
R. O. A. Haliem, “Forced Marriage in Islamic Countries: A Study of Zana Muhsen’s Memoir Sold,” Arabic and World Literature: Comparative and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 2025, 2025, doi: 10.31526/AWL.2025.568.
E. Sibanda and F. Sibanda, “Regai Dzive Shiri: Early Girl-Child Marriage, Human Trafficking, and Erasure to Development in Masvingo Province,” 2024, pp. 49–75. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-76088-4_4.
T. A. S. Mohammed, “Exploring Child Marriage in Yemen: A Critical Analysis of an Arab Media Corpus,” Qualitative Research Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 125–146, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1108/QRJ-02-2024-0036.
S. Sumadi, “Grassroots Feminist Resistance Against Human Trafficking: The Role of Women’s Movements in the Documenter Film ‘Begini Kawin Kontrak di Cianjur,’” in International Conference on Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, 2024, pp. 1–10. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://proceeding.uinsuku.ac.id/index.php/ICIGS/article/view/1276
L. A. Kagher, L. Otaye‐Ebede, and B. Metcalfe, “Black Lives and Bodywork Matters: a Postcolonial Critique of Gender and Embodiment in Nigeria,” Gend. Work Organ., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1787–1804, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1111/gwao.12638.
A. Dragojlovic and K. McGregor, “‘They Call Me Babu’: The Politics of Visibility and Gendered Memories of Dutch Colonialism in Indonesia,” Womens Hist. Rev., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 933–952, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1080/09612025.2022.2090709.
H. R. Wibowo, M. Ratnaningsih, N. J. Goodwin, D. F. Ulum, and E. Minnick, “One Household, Two Worlds: Differences of Perception towards Child Marriage among Adolescent Children and Adults in Indonesia,” Lancet Reg. Health West. Pac., vol. 8, p. 100103, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100103.
E. K. M. Tisdall and P. Cuevas-Parra, “Challenges for Children’s Participation: Child Activism for Ending Child Marriage,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 108, p. 104568, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104568.
R. T. Naved et al., “Effectiveness of Combined Interventions to Empower Girls and Address Social Norms in Reducing Child Marriage in a Rural Sub-District of Bangladesh: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of the Tipping Point Initiative,” J. Glob. Health, vol. 14, p. 04020, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04020.
A. Pourtaheri, M. Mahdizadeh, H. Tehrani, J. Jamali, and N. Peyman, “Socio-Ecological Factors of Girl Child Marriage: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research,” BMC Public Health, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 428, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17626-z.
A. Pujar et al., “Boys’ Perspectives on Girls’ Marriage and School Dropout: A Qualitative Study Revisiting a Structural Intervention in Southern India,” Cult. Health Sex., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 701–716, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2241525.
N. K. Gale, G. Heath, E. Cameron, S. Rashid, and S. Redwood, “Using The Framework Method for The Analysis of Qualitative Data in Multi-Disciplinary Health Research,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 117, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
M. Ratnaningsih et al., “Child Marriage Acceptability Index (CMAI) as an Essential Indicator: an Investigation in South and Central Sulawesi, Indonesia,” Glob. Health Res. Policy, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 32, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s41256-022-00252-4.
S. Suleymani, “Azerbaijani Turk Women’s Resistance and The Woman, Life, Freedom Movement: The Politics of Intersectionality and Recognition in Iran,” Social Identities, pp. 1–22, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1080/13504630.2026.2662613.
S. Saharso, S. Tack, and L. Blonk, “Living with and Leaving Oppressive Conditions: The Role of Imagination in Migrant Women’s Life Stories,” Social Identities, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1080/13504630.2026.2635130.
M. Gonick, “Between Girl Power and Reviving Ophelia?: Constituting the Neoliberal Girl Subject,” NWSA Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–23, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.2979/NWS.2006.18.2.1.
B. D. Biswas, “The Politics of Recognition: The Role of Identity in Social Mobility Among Marginalised Communities in India,” Social Identities, pp. 1–12, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1080/13504630.2026.2682888.
M. Dungy and A. Krings, “Responsibilization and Retraditionalization: How Neoliberal Logics Reproduce Gender Inequities Among Women Community Organizers in Chicago,” Affilia, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 683–700, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1177/08861099241238199.
K. Austrian et al., “Long-Term Impacts of a Cash Plus Program on Marriage, Fertility, and Education After Six Years in Pastoralist Kenya: A Cluster Randomized Trial,” SSM Popul. Health, vol. 26, p. 101663, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101663.
V. Adriany, N. N. S. Qosyasih, and E. Malihah, “Unpacking the Discourse of Child Marriage in Indonesia: A Decolonial Perspective,” Child. Soc., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 89–98, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1111/chso.13013.
D. Kalfas, S. Kalogiannidis, O. Papaevangelou, K. Melfou, and F. Chatzitheodoridis, “Integration of Technology in Agricultural Practices towards Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study of Greece,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 2664, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16072664.
C. Bacchi, “The Ethics of Problem Representation: Widening the Scope of Ethical Debate,” Policy Soc., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 5–20, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70112-1.
R. Berger, “Now I See It, Now I Don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research,” Qualitative Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 219–234, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1468794112468475.
R. J. Sampson and S. Consoli, “Innovating Language Motivation Research: The Localized Possibilities of Practitioner Research,” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, pp. 1–13, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1080/17501229.2025.2492293.
N. Fraser, Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Columbia University Press, 2008.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







